You Are Here: Previous IssuesVolume 3 Issue 1 January – June 2010 → Why students find Mathematics difficult?

OPEN ACCESS PEER-REVIEWED

Conceptual Study – Published: January 28, 2010


Why students find Mathematics difficult?

S Sundaram
ABSTRACT
This paper explores the reasons why students often find mathematics difficult at the school level, with a focus on primary education where foundational attitudes toward the subject are formed. The study identifies two core issues: the widespread misunderstanding of mathematics among teachers, and the inappropriate pedagogical methods used in classrooms. Mathematics is frequently misinterpreted as a subject of rote memorization rather than a way of understanding patterns, relationships, and abstract concepts. Teachers’ inability to convey conceptual clarity, combined with linguistic and pedagogical limitations, contributes to students’ difficulties in learning. Additional challenges include inadequate understanding of children’s cognitive development, overemphasis on writing, and limited use of activities and visualization. The paper suggests classroom strategies such as relating concepts to students’ experiences, employing concrete-to-abstract progression, encouraging peer interactions, using activity-based methods, reducing reliance on rote memorization, and promoting meaningful practice over mechanical drills. These approaches aim to make mathematics learning accessible, enjoyable, and conceptually rich.
Keywords: Mathematics Learning Difficulties; Primary Education; Misunderstanding of Mathematics; Inappropriate Pedagogy; Conceptual Understanding; Activity-Based Learning; Student Engagement.
This is an Open Access Research distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any Medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
How to cite this article:
Sundaram, S. (2010). Why students find mathematics difficult? Indian Educational Researcher, 3(1), 59–65.
Received: December 15, 2009; Revision Received: January 10, 2010; Accepted: January 28, 2010.